ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Health economic evaluation studies in India's traditional system of medicine (Ayush): A scoping review.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health economic studies offer valuable insights for improving healthcare decision-making and optimizing resource use. India's traditional medical systems, known as Ayush, are globally recognized. To document health economic studies in Ayush, we conducted a scoping review to examine their characteristics. We used a set of keywords as finalized by field experts to search in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Ayush research databases, and the reference lists of selected studies to retrieve the relevant studies until August 2023. Two independent reviewers used the Rayyan web tool to screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts of selected studies. We extracted the information and presented the descriptive data as numbers and proportions. We reviewed 49 studies for data extraction, primarily focusing on Homeopathy and Yoga, each with 19 studies, followed by Naturopathy (n = 5), Ayush/combined (n = 5), and Ayurveda (n = 1). About one-third of the studies were full economic evaluations (n = 17). The majority of full and partial economic evaluation studies were conducted in Yoga (n = 11) and Homeopathy (n = 16), respectively. Most studies covered musculoskeletal diseases (n = 13), and more than half of the diseases belong to noncommunicable diseases (n = 28). The majority of the research studies were published in Q1 journals (n = 18). Health economic evaluation studies in Ayush are limited, yet their utilization and market size are growing. To support resource allocation and decision-making, comprehensive economic evaluation studies on Siddha, Unani, and Ayurveda systems are essential. This scoping review highlights the need to address existing knowledge gaps in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.