ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Improving admission clerking standards and physical health assessments in febrile patients: A prospective clinical audit at a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical audit is an effective tool to improve patient care, which in turn has an impact on clinical outcome.Patients who present with fever usually are generally admitted based on competency-based criteria, where admission is determined on the severity of the illness assessed through clinical and laboratory findings. Bacterial infections were linked to high sepsis-related mortality. This highlights the importance of comprehensive and standardized admission clerking and physical assessment for patients presenting with fever. This audit aimed to evaluate the documentation of history, physical examination, and investigations in febrile patients by postgraduate trainees at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Methods: A prospective audit of 50 case records of patients admitted with fever was conducted over a four-week period in the medical wards. A predefined pro forma was used to review key domains, including documentation of admission details, clinical history, physical examination (vital signs and systemic examination), and relevant investigations. Findings were measured against departmental standards and analyzed to identify areas for improvement. Results: Documentation completeness by the post graduate trainee's completeness varied across domains. Admission details were documented in 86% of cases, and comprehensive history was recorded in 72%. While vital signs were documented well (>90%), systemic examination showed significant variability (CVS: 80% vs CNS: 66%). Documentation of specific investigations was inconsistent: dengue serology (62%), WIDAL test or blood culture (54%), and Scrub typhus serology (38%). Conclusion: The clinical audit revealed notable variability in admission documentation by postgraduate trainees, particularly in the systemic examination and investigation domains. The findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions and reinforcement of documentation protocols to enhance patient assessment and care, particularly in febrile patients, where inadequate management can lead to high case fatality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.