ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Determinants of patient satisfaction with virtual primary health care clinics in Jeddah, 2024-2025.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual clinics have become essential in modern healthcare delivery, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. In Saudi Arabia, the Ministry of Health has expanded telemedicine services to enhance accessibility and efficiency. However, limited research has examined user perceptions within the city of Jeddah. Objective: This study was conducted in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, among patients attending Ministry of Health primary health care centers offering virtual family medicine services. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative design was employed using semi-structured interviews and a structured survey (N = 318). Descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis were applied. Key themes were triangulated with participant demographics and service usage patterns. Results: Participants expressed appreciation for the convenience and time-saving aspects of virtual clinics. Nonetheless, concerns were raised regarding diagnostic accuracy, communication barriers, and the absence of physical examination. Gender differences and prior exposure to telehealth significantly influenced preference, with males showing higher favorability toward in-person consultations. Providers emphasized the need for better training and integration of virtual tools. Conclusion: The transition toward virtual healthcare requires not only technological adoption but also attention to user trust and satisfaction. Enhancing digital literacy, addressing infrastructure gaps, and offering hybrid models may optimize the effectiveness and acceptance of virtual care in the Hail region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.