ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Treatment of Pediatric Fingertip Amputations by Chest and Palm Subcutaneous Pocket Techniques.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although chest and palm subcutaneous pocket techniques are effective for pediatric fingertip amputations, particularly in pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age, few studies exist due to the rarity of these injuries. We report the treatment outcomes at our institution and consider factors associated with graft survival. Methods: We reviewed pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age with fingertip amputations who underwent the chest and palm subcutaneous pocket techniques between 2013 and 2025. Collected data included age, completeness of amputation, Ishikawa classification, donor site and pocketing period, postoperative management after separation (wet or gauze dressing), and graft survival. Graft survival was classified as complete recovery or partial necrosis. Results: Six patients (7 digits) were included in the study. The mean age was 17.4 months. Five digits had complete amputations, and 2 had incomplete amputations. According to the Ishikawa classification, 1 digit was classified as subzone I, and 3 digits each were classified as subzones II and III. Donor sites included 5 digits on the chest and 2 on the palm. The mean pocketing period was 11.7 days. All digits survived; however, partial necrosis occurred in 3 digits (43%). The pocketing period was longer in the complete recovery group (13.5 versus 9.3 d), and the wet dressing method tended to be used more frequently. Conclusions: Chest and palm subcutaneous pocket techniques are useful for pediatric fingertip amputations; however, maintaining an adequate pocketing period and appropriate postoperative wound management may be beneficial for improving graft survival.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.