ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Liposuction and Skin Tightening by Plastic Internal Low-angular Retraction Technique to Direct Skin Retraction with Monopolar Radiofrequency.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liposuction remains one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures; however, its ability to address skin laxity is limited. Energy-based technologies such as radiofrequency (RF) have been introduced to improve dermal contraction, though their reproducibility and efficiency remain variable. This study aimed to describe the plastic internal low-angular retraction (PILAR) technique and evaluate its clinical outcomes compared to conventional RF-assisted liposuction. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted, including 100 patients undergoing liposuction between 2022 and 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups: conventional RF-assisted liposuction (n = 36) and PILAR technique (n = 64). Outcomes included energy delivery, device use time, complications, and patient satisfaction measured using the BODY-Q scale. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The PILAR technique was associated with significantly lower total energy use (44,195 J versus 84,939 J; Conclusions: The PILAR technique was associated with improved efficiency, reduced complication rates, and high patient satisfaction while maintaining comparable contouring outcomes. These findings suggested that targeted subdermal RF delivery may enhance skin retraction and procedural safety. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm its long-term efficacy and generalizability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.