Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453188›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026

Functional outcome after repeat surgery of tumor progression or treatment-associated changes in high-grade glioma: Clinical and radiological predictors.

Anouk M de Jong, Maud E Kortman, Maarten W Kreek, Christina M Flies, Aline P Becker, Matthijs van der Meulen, Filip Y F L de Vos, Jan-Willem Dankbaar, Joost J C Verhoeff, Pierre A J T Robe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anouk M de JongDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2469-3484
Maud E KortmanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten W KreekDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christina M FliesDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aline P BeckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA (A.P.B., P.A.J.T.R.).
Matthijs van der MeulenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Filip Y F L de VosDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9082-5991
Jan-Willem DankbaarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joost J C VerhoeffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pierre A J T RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tom J SnijdersDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-081X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recurrence of high-grade glioma after primary treatment is inevitable. New contrast-enhancing lesions on follow-up MRI may indicate tumor progression, treatment-associated changes (TAC), or both. A repeated surgical procedure, either biopsy or resection, provides diagnostic clarity and therapeutic benefit, but carries risks. In the patient-specific decision to operate, current literature offers limited guidance on which patients may benefit. This study aimed to describe functional outcomes after repeat surgery of previously irradiated glioma, and to identify predictors of functional deterioration. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study. Adults with diffuse glioma who underwent first-line radiotherapy and subsequent repeat surgery (biopsy or resection) for suspected high-grade radiological progression were included. Lesions were histologically classified as progression, TAC, or both. The primary endpoint was functional outcome 30 days postoperatively, expressed as decline of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Logistic regression identified predictors of KPS decline. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Results: Of 166 patients, 37 (22.3%) experienced a KPS deterioration, 127 (76.5%) remained stable, and 2 (1.2%) improved. Rates of functional deterioration were similar after biopsies and resections. Preoperative steroid usage (odds ratio = 2.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.09-6.79, Conclusions: In this cohort, 22.3% of patients experienced functional decline 30 days after a repeat surgery (biopsy or resection). Preoperative steroid usage predicted deterioration. These findings may provide clinical guidance in identifying which patients will benefit from repeat surgery.

Indexed as

functional outcomehigh-grade gliomapseudoprogressionradionecrosisrepeat surgery

Identifiers

PMID42453188
PMCPMC13365144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.