Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42453077›Full record

SynthesisCritical care explorations2026

Drug Clearance and Dosing During CytoSorb Hemoadsorption: A Systematic Review.

Teresa Klaus, Patrick M Honoré, Gabriella Bottari, Silvia De Rosa, Detlef Kindgen-Milles, Antoine Schneider, Nandor Marczin, Harriet Adamson, Joerg Scheier, Efthymios N Deliargyris and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Teresa KlausMedical Affairs Department, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick M HonoréIntensive Care Unit Department, CHUUCL Namur Mont-Godinne, UCL Louvain Medical School, Yvoir, Belgium.
Gabriella BottariPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children Hospital Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Silvia De RosaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Centre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Detlef Kindgen-MillesDepartment for Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Antoine SchneiderAdult Intensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nandor MarczinDivision of Anaesthesia, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Harriet AdamsonMedical Affairs Department, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Joerg ScheierMedical Affairs Department, CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Efthymios N DeliargyrisMedical Affairs Department, CytoSorbents Corporation and CytoSorbents Medical, Princeton, NJ.
Thomas D NolinDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCytoSorb (CS) hemoadsorption is increasingly used in critical care and cardiac surgery to remove inflammatory mediators and select drugs. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence on intentional drug removal as well as unintentional drug removal during CS therapy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, congress abstracts, and CytoSorbents online literature database. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included benchtop, animal, and human pharmacokinetic investigations of drug removal during CS therapy as well as clinical reports describing CS use for drug overdose. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the eligible studies were extracted independently by two authors into Microsoft Excel. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were identified for drugs across multiple therapeutic classes, including analgesics, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, anti-infectives, antithrombotics, anxiolytics, and immunosuppressants. Drugs were categorized into low (< 30%), moderate (30-60%), or high (> 60%) removal rate, or by the relative increase in clearance attributable to CS: negligible (< 25%), low (25-100%), moderate (100-400%), or high (> 400%). Based on the assembled data and considering drug-, patient-, and circuit-specific factors, general dosing recommendations for concomitant medications were developed.

conclusionsCS therapy can alter drug concentrations for select agents with variable clinical relevance. CS can reduce perioperative bleeding risk through antithrombotic removal and treat certain drug overdoses. Unintentional drug removal during CS therapy may occur and practical guidance is provided for drugs with known susceptibility to removal.

Indexed as

HemoperfusionAnimalsDrug OverdoseHumansantithromboticsCytoSorbextracorporeal clearancehemoadsorptionhemoperfusionpharmacodynamicpharmacokinetictherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42453077
PMCPMC13372516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.