SynthesisCritical care explorations2026
Drug Clearance and Dosing During CytoSorb Hemoadsorption: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Drug Clearance and Dosing During CytoSorb Hemoadsorption: A Systematic Review: Erratum.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCytoSorb (CS) hemoadsorption is increasingly used in critical care and cardiac surgery to remove inflammatory mediators and select drugs. This systematic review aimed to summarize available evidence on intentional drug removal as well as unintentional drug removal during CS therapy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, congress abstracts, and CytoSorbents online literature database. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies included benchtop, animal, and human pharmacokinetic investigations of drug removal during CS therapy as well as clinical reports describing CS use for drug overdose. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from the eligible studies were extracted independently by two authors into Microsoft Excel. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were identified for drugs across multiple therapeutic classes, including analgesics, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antihypertensives, anti-infectives, antithrombotics, anxiolytics, and immunosuppressants. Drugs were categorized into low (< 30%), moderate (30-60%), or high (> 60%) removal rate, or by the relative increase in clearance attributable to CS: negligible (< 25%), low (25-100%), moderate (100-400%), or high (> 400%). Based on the assembled data and considering drug-, patient-, and circuit-specific factors, general dosing recommendations for concomitant medications were developed.
conclusionsCS therapy can alter drug concentrations for select agents with variable clinical relevance. CS can reduce perioperative bleeding risk through antithrombotic removal and treat certain drug overdoses. Unintentional drug removal during CS therapy may occur and practical guidance is provided for drugs with known susceptibility to removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.