ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2026
Testing the applicability of the Parenting Occupations and Purposes Framework in an Irish context.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Testing the applicability of the Parenting Occupations and Purposes Framework in an Irish context.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding the form, function, and meaning of occupations is essential for effective occupational therapy practice. Parenting is widely recognised as a meaningful and valued occupation. The Parenting Occupations and Purposes (POP) Framework conceptualises parenting occupations and their underlying purposes, but its validity in real-world contexts has not been tested. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the POP Framework among parents in Ireland.
methodsAn exploratory descriptive design using Experience Sampling Methodology captured real-time data on parenting occupations and purposes via the Participation In Everyday Life mobile application. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics as well as deductive and inductive content analysis to assess the framework's applicability to the sample. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Collaboration with the POP Framework developers ensured accurate application of its concepts. Partnership with the developer of the Participation In Everyday Life mobile application supported correct setup and usability.
resultsForty-four parents completed 1150 surveys over 7 days. All categories in the POP Framework were represented. The most frequent occupation was attending to the child's basic needs (223 occurrences) while seeking help appeared only once. Among purposes, having the child's basic needs met dominated (571 occurrences), whereas purposes related to continuous parental development were least frequent. New examples of occupations emerged, including faith-based activities, purchasing discretionary goods, and technology-mediated monitoring (e.g., texting a spouse to check on a child), suggesting areas for framework expansion.
conclusionFindings support the validity of the POP Framework in a real-world context while highlighting opportunities for refinement to capture cultural and technological dimensions of parenting. Enhancing the framework may improve understanding of parenting occupations and inform more comprehensive occupational therapy services for parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.