ArticleJournal of medical virology2026
Severe COVID-19 in Pregnant Versus Nonpregnant Women: Intensive Care Unit Outcomes and Perinatal Risks.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Severe COVID-19 in Pregnant Versus Nonpregnant Women: Intensive Care Unit Outcomes and Perinatal Risks.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 has posed significant challenges worldwide, with pregnant individuals identified as being at increased risk for severe illness and poor outcomes compared to the general population. This study aimed to compare the course of critical illness due to COVID-19 of pregnant patients to nonpregnant reproductive-age women and describe their perinatal outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including women ages 14-49 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19-related illness from 3/2020 to 2/2022 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared between pregnant/postpartum and nonpregnant patients. Neonatal outcomes were also analyzed. Among 159 women, 35 (22%) were pregnant or postpartum. Pregnant patients had a lower body mass index, were more likely to be publicly insured, and were less likely to have underlying comorbidities. The groups had similar proportions of mechanical ventilation, venous thromboembolism, and death. However, pregnant patients were more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The proportion of individuals who were vaccinated against COVID-19 was low in both groups. Of 19 neonates born, the mean gestational age was 32.9 weeks, with 94.7% delivered via cesarean and 78.9% requiring NICU admission. Five intrauterine fetal demises and one neonatal death occurred. Though pregnant patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 had fewer comorbidities compared to nonpregnant women, nearly one-fifth of them required ECMO. Pregnant patients with COVID-19 ICU admission face high risks of ECMO, preterm delivery, cesarean, and fetal loss. Improving vaccination uptake is critical, especially in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.