ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Exploring primary care access in Finland: a mixed-methods study in the context of the updated waiting-time guarantee.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prompt primary care (PC) access is salient for equitable care. Finland has a high level of unmet health needs, characterized by stark socioeconomic disparities and accounted for by long waiting times. In September 2023, Finland updated its legislation regulating waiting times to non-urgent general practitioner (GP) consultations, reducing the maximum waiting time to 14 days. Hereafter, PC access statistics improved. We assessed patients' views towards PC access after the policy update and how they reflect against national statistics. This is an exploratory sequential mixed-methods study in rural North Karelia, Finland. Interviews with patients and staff (n = 40) and observations (150+ hours) were conducted in a public PC centre in January-March 2024. Data on GP consultations including waiting times were obtained annually from individual-level national registers in 2017-24. Older patients with chronic health needs stated increased difficulties in navigating an increasingly digital PC and lack of access to in-person consultations. Staff reported an accelerated need for 'gatekeeping' access to GP consultations due to lack of resources. The number of all GP consultations increased 1.69-fold from 2017 to 2024, but in-person ones reduced 0.60-fold. A change in definition explained the improvement of waiting time statistics. A more robust waiting-time guarantee in Finland took place in tandem with austerity measures and a rapid shift to telemedicine. Improved PC access statistics conflict with local experiences and ignore reduced provision of in-person GP consultations, thus hiding the associated equity impacts. Our results call for investing in more nuanced monitoring of policy changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.