Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42452850›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026

Relevance of prematurity and foetal growth restriction for romantic relationships, health-risk behaviours, and socio-economic outcomes in adulthood.

Achim Fieß, Sandra Gißler, Alexander K Schuster, Jonas Tesarz, Eva Mildenberger, Elmar Brähler, Michael S Urschitz, Norbert Pfeiffer, Manfred E Beutel, Alica Hartmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Achim FießDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sandra GißlerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Alexander K SchusterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jonas TesarzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Eva MildenbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael S UrschitzDivision of Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Norbert PfeifferDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-2617
Manfred E BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1743-0042
Alica HartmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Mareike ErnstDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4952-9717

Funding

Ernst und Berta-Grimmke Stiftung, Stufe 1 support of the UM and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neonatal care have improved survival rates of preterm and growth-restricted infants. However, concerns remain regarding their long-term psychosocial development. This study investigated psychosocial outcomes in adults born preterm or growth-restricted. The Gutenberg Prematurity Study is a retrospective cohort study including 606 participants (326 women, 53.8%) aged 18-52 years. Participants were categorized by gestational age (GA) as extremely preterm (≤28 weeks), very preterm (29-32 weeks), moderately preterm (33-36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks), and by birth weight percentile as small for GA (SGA), appropriate for GA, and large for GA. Logistic regression assessed associations of GA and birth weight with romantic relationships and health-risk behaviours. Socio-economic status (SES) parameters were analysed using linear regression. Extremely and very preterm participants reported fewer health-risk behaviours, particularly lower alcohol consumption [extremely preterm: odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.49; P < 0.001]. Similarly, participants born SGA were less likely to report current alcohol consumption (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.98; P = 0.04). A trend towards lower odds of ever having been in a romantic relationship was observed (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.11-1.09; P = 0.07). Being born extremely or moderately preterm was associated with lower overall SES (extremely preterm: β = -2.25; 95% CI: -3.22 to -1.27; P < 0.001; moderately preterm: β = -1.04; 95% CI: -1.73 to -0.35; P = 0.003). No significant associations were found for present relationship status, relationship satisfaction, or smoking behaviour. Preterm birth and foetal growth restriction are associated with adult psychosocial outcomes, with preterm birth more strongly affecting socio-economic outcomes, underscoring the need for targeted support.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationHealth Risk BehaviorsInfant, PrematureInterpersonal RelationsPremature BirthAdolescentAdultFemaleGermanyGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaleMiddle AgedPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42452850
PMCPMC13368824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.