Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42452710›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review.

Handi Y Salim, Awais Tahir, Wen Hui Teh, Mala Jheinga, Sherab Thaye, Lampson Fan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Handi Y SalimDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-0015
Awais TahirDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1645-773X
Wen Hui TehDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Mala JheingaDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Sherab ThayeDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Lampson FanDepartment of Cardiology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1406-6743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major contributor to repeat revascularisation despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. Its persistence reflects a complex and heterogeneous interplay among mechanical, biological, and procedural factors, and understanding the dominant mechanism in each case is fundamental to effective treatment selection. This narrative review provides a contemporary, mechanism-guided approach to the practical management of coronary ISR. We summarise the definition, incidence, and classification of ISR-including the Mehran, Waksman, and SCAI 2023 time-based frameworks-and outline patient-related, procedural, anatomical, and stent-related risk factors. The pathophysiology of neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis is discussed with reference to its clinical implications. Intracoronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) is central to ISR characterisation and treatment planning. Current international guidelines support imaging use in ISR management, though it is important to recognise that this recommendation is based largely on observational and surrogate-endpoint data rather than ISR-specific randomised trials demonstrating reductions in hard clinical outcomes, and practical barriers including cost, availability, and operator expertise must be acknowledged. Evidence-based treatment strategies-including drug-coated balloons (DCB), repeat DES implantation, lesion-modifying therapies, vascular brachytherapy, and coronary artery bypass grafting-are reviewed critically with reference to contemporary trial data and their specific clinical applicability. The choice between DCB and repeat DES is addressed with greater nuance, accounting for ISR type (BMS-ISR versus DES-ISR), lesion pattern, stent layering, and bleeding risk. Management considerations in complex subsets-chronic total occlusion ISR, left main ISR, saphenous vein graft ISR, and recurrent ISR-are also addressed. We propose a practical, substrate-driven management framework aligned with the 2024 ESC, 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI, and 2018 JCS/JSCVS guidelines. Future research priorities include ISR-specific randomised trials with hard clinical endpoints, prospective validation of imaging-guided treatment algorithms, head-to-head comparisons of DCB platforms, and investigation of pharmacological strategies targeting neoatherosclerosis progression.

Indexed as

coronary in-stent restenosisintracoronary imagingpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID42452710
PMCPMC13363650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.