ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major contributor to repeat revascularisation despite advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. Its persistence reflects a complex and heterogeneous interplay among mechanical, biological, and procedural factors, and understanding the dominant mechanism in each case is fundamental to effective treatment selection. This narrative review provides a contemporary, mechanism-guided approach to the practical management of coronary ISR. We summarise the definition, incidence, and classification of ISR-including the Mehran, Waksman, and SCAI 2023 time-based frameworks-and outline patient-related, procedural, anatomical, and stent-related risk factors. The pathophysiology of neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis is discussed with reference to its clinical implications. Intracoronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) is central to ISR characterisation and treatment planning. Current international guidelines support imaging use in ISR management, though it is important to recognise that this recommendation is based largely on observational and surrogate-endpoint data rather than ISR-specific randomised trials demonstrating reductions in hard clinical outcomes, and practical barriers including cost, availability, and operator expertise must be acknowledged. Evidence-based treatment strategies-including drug-coated balloons (DCB), repeat DES implantation, lesion-modifying therapies, vascular brachytherapy, and coronary artery bypass grafting-are reviewed critically with reference to contemporary trial data and their specific clinical applicability. The choice between DCB and repeat DES is addressed with greater nuance, accounting for ISR type (BMS-ISR versus DES-ISR), lesion pattern, stent layering, and bleeding risk. Management considerations in complex subsets-chronic total occlusion ISR, left main ISR, saphenous vein graft ISR, and recurrent ISR-are also addressed. We propose a practical, substrate-driven management framework aligned with the 2024 ESC, 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI, and 2018 JCS/JSCVS guidelines. Future research priorities include ISR-specific randomised trials with hard clinical endpoints, prospective validation of imaging-guided treatment algorithms, head-to-head comparisons of DCB platforms, and investigation of pharmacological strategies targeting neoatherosclerosis progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.