Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42452595›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Complex Thoracic Resections in the Minimally Invasive Era: Is Open Surgery Becoming a Lost Skill?

Giacomo Argento, Erino Angelo Rendina, Giulio Maurizi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giacomo ArgentoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-4032-9239
Erino Angelo RendinaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Giulio MauriziDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has reshaped thoracic surgical practice over the last two decades, offering reduced perioperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and oncological outcomes comparable to conventional thoracotomy in appropriately selected patients. Minimally invasive techniques now account for the majority of anatomical pulmonary resections in many high-volume centers and are being explored, in selected patients at experienced institutions, for increasingly complex procedures. This shift, however, raises a question that has received comparatively little attention: whether reduced trainee exposure to open thoracotomy may, over time, erode open thoracic surgical competence. As minimally invasive approaches become the institutional default, exposure to open surgery is declining, and the skills required to perform complex open resections or to manage intraoperative emergencies may become confined to a diminishing cohort of senior surgeons. In this narrative review, we examine the current boundaries of minimally invasive thoracic surgery, define the clinical scenarios in which open surgery remains indispensable-including bronchoplastic and angioplastic resections, post-induction hostile surgical fields, and unplanned conversion-and consider the implications of the ongoing paradigm shift for training, taking into account the substantial variability of thoracic surgical practice across different regions. We argue that open thoracic surgery is not an obsolete discipline but a foundational competence whose preservation may warrant deliberate attention through structured exposure, simulation, mentorship, and dedicated competence assessment. Throughout, we have sought to distinguish documented trends from reasonable concern and from speculative future risk, and we frame the central issue explicitly as a credible and foreseeable risk rather than a demonstrated decline.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgeryopen thoracotomysleeve lobectomysurgical trainingthoracic surgeryVATS

Identifiers

PMID42452595
PMCPMC13363155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.