ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Stratified Psychosocial Care in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Framework Across the IVF Pathway.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART), particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF), are characterized by substantial emotional burden, uncertainty, and repeated decision-making under probabilistic conditions. Although psychological distress is common among individuals and couples undergoing ART, psychosocial care remains inconsistently integrated into fertility pathways and is rarely tailored to individual needs. This narrative review synthesizes evidence concerning infertility-related distress, anxiety and depressive symptoms, couple functioning, treatment discontinuation, psychosocial screening, and psychological interventions across the IVF trajectory. Key phases of treatment, including pretreatment assessment, ovarian stimulation, embryo transfer, the waiting period, cycle outcome, and decisions regarding repetition or discontinuation, are described, and phase-specific psychological vulnerabilities are identified. On the basis of the available literature, we propose a conceptual stepped-care framework ranging from universal psychoeducation and routine monitoring to structured psychological interventions, couple-based care, and specialist psychiatric management. Practical screening thresholds, referral criteria, reassessment intervals, and a safety pathway for suicidal ideation are outlined. Particular attention is given to male-factor infertility, strategies for engaging male partners, and the ethical and data-governance requirements of digital mental health tools. Current evidence supports psychosocial interventions for improving emotional well-being and quality of life and suggests a potential role in treatment continuation, but their effects on pregnancy and live-birth outcomes remain uncertain. The proposed framework should therefore be regarded as a clinically informed conceptual model rather than a validated prediction algorithm. Prospective studies are required to assess its feasibility, predictive performance, cost-effectiveness, and impact on patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.