Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42452561›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Bladder Preservation Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Patrick P Carriere, Comron J Hassanzadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick P CarriereDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Comron J HassanzadehDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Genitourinary Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder preservation has emerged as an established treatment option for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), offering durable oncologic control with the potential to maintain native bladder function and quality of life. Over the past several decades, prospective trials and large institutional experiences have refined trimodality therapy (TMT)-maximal transurethral resection followed by definitive radiation therapy with concurrent radiosensitizing systemic therapy-and clarified principles of patient selection, treatment delivery, surveillance, and salvage. Randomized evidence supports combined-modality therapy as the backbone of bladder preservation, and contemporary comparative analyses suggest outcomes comparable to radical cystectomy in appropriately selected populations. This review synthesizes the clinical foundations of bladder preservation, including radiobiologic considerations, advances in radiation technique, and patterns of recurrence following TMT. We discuss outcomes in higher-risk populations, including locally advanced and node-positive disease, and examine the evolving integration of systemic therapies. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates in urothelial carcinoma has reshaped the systemic treatment landscape and raises important questions regarding patient selection, sequencing, and the potential expansion of organ-preserving strategies. Finally, we outline future directions-including response-adaptive approaches, advances in image-guided and adaptive radiotherapy, and ctDNA-enabled risk stratification-while emphasizing the need for prospective validation and multidisciplinary collaboration to refine and optimize bladder-preserving care.

Indexed as

bladder preservationmuscle-invasive bladder cancerradiation therapytrimodality therapy

Identifiers

PMID42452561
PMCPMC13362832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.