ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Nose-to-Eye Delivery: The Potential of Intranasal Administration in Ophthalmology.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive drug delivery for ocular diseases remains a significant challenge in ophthalmology, as conventional eye drops offer less than 5% bioavailability due to pre-corneal barriers and the corneal epithelium. This review explores the intranasal (IN) route as a promising strategy for targeting both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. The IN route leverages several distinct pathways: the nasolacrimal reflex for remote physiological stimulation; the "neural bridge" through the cribriform plate, allowing direct perineural and vascular transport via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves to bypass the blood-retinal barrier; and systemic absorption that avoids hepatic first-pass metabolism. Pre-clinical evidence indicates that IN administration of agents such as erythropoietin, nerve growth factor, and insulin achieves superior retinal concentrations compared to topical or systemic dosing, offering neuroprotection in models of retinal degeneration and glaucoma. Clinically, varenicline nasal spray is already FDA-approved for dry eye disease, while intranasal steroids demonstrate a favorable ocular safety profile without significantly increasing intraocular pressure. Although limited by mucociliary clearance and small delivery volumes, the IN route offers a painless, non-invasive alternative to intraocular injections, potentially enhancing patient compliance. Future advancements in mucoadhesive nanocarriers are essential to optimize drug residence time and realize the full potential of nose-to-eye delivery in chronic ophthalmic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.