ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparison of Isotope Mass Balance and AquaCrop Model in Evapotranspiration Partitioning in a Maize Field of North China.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning into soil evaporation (E) and plant transpiration (T) is crucial for improving agricultural water use efficiency in water-scarce regions. The isotope mass balance (IMB) method and AquaCrop model are two widely used approaches for ET partitioning, yet their comparative performance across different crop growth stages remains poorly characterized. This study systematically compared these two methods using two consecutive years (2012-2013) of field isotopic observations in a summer maize field on the North China Plain, a core maize production area facing severe agricultural water scarcity. Stable isotope analysis showed that the local meteoric water line (LMWL) had a slope lower than the global meteoric water line. The 0-5 cm surface soil water evaporation lines had slopes of 5.84 (2012) and 8.06 (2013), confirming significant evaporative enrichment in the topsoil. Plant water isotopic composition closely resembled that of 40-100 cm deep soil water, indicating limited root uptake from the surface layer. IMB-estimated transpiration ratio (T/ET) exhibited distinct phenological patterns, increasing from 37 to 44% at jointing to a peak of 94-96% at filling, then declining to 84-85% at maturity. The two methods agreed well during filling to maturity (differences of 2-10%), but compared with the IMB method, AquaCrop substantially underestimated T/ET at jointing (0.9% vs. 43.8% in 2013) due to its canopy-cover-based transpiration algorithm. These findings identify the filling stage as the critical water demand period, providing a quantitative reference for precision irrigation management under similar climate and soil conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.