ReviewPolymers2026
Recent Advances in Materials and Testing Methodologies for Soft Body Armor.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ballistic impact behavior of soft body armor is governed by complex interactions between material architecture and projectile characteristics. This review provides a critical overview of the evolution of textile and composite-based armor materials developed for ballistic protection. Emphasis is placed on experimental and analytical methodologies used to elucidate impact energy dissipation, deformation mechanisms, and failure modes. Key material-related parameters influencing ballistic performance including areal density, weave architecture, yarn crimp, twist, and thread density are systematically discussed, along with assembly variables such as ply orientation, layer number, and hybrid configurations. In parallel, the influence of projectile mass, velocity, and geometry on impact resistance is examined. The review also summarizes internationally adopted ballistic and stab-resistance standards employed for soft armor evaluation. Various assessment techniques, including yarn-yarn friction analysis, puncture resistance testing, ballistic limit velocity determination, and back-face signature measurement, are critically reviewed. Strategies aimed at enhancing impact performance, such as rubber or latex impregnation, fiber surface modification, and the incorporation of shear thickening fluids, are comprehensively discussed. Attention is given to shear thickening fluids due to their significant role in improving energy absorption and flexibility. The fundamental mechanisms governing shear thickening behavior and the parameters affecting their performance are analyzed. Overall, this review highlights emerging material design strategies and performance optimization approaches for next-generation soft body armor systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.