ArticlePolymers2026
On Strength Variations Effected by Infill Patterns Such as Honeycomb, Gyroid, and Archimedean Chords Used in Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing delivers internal substructures that alter the mechanical performance, yet their exploitation is still limited in structural part design, to a certain degree due to the absence of comparative studies. All slicer software solutions can exchange the infill with predefined infill patterns. Often their performance properties are unknown, and engineers make choices that depend on the printing time or material use. We conduct an experimental campaign to understand infill patterns' effect on the mechanical performance. This work is inspired by biomimicry and studies honeycomb-, gyroid-, and Archimedean chords-type infill patterns in order to determine their performance. Experimental analysis via the three-point bending test has been conducted by using samples from PolyLactic Acid (PLA) with infill densities of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100% for these infill patterns. An additional set of samples was printed with Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) for additional evaluation of Archimedean chords. We characterize the mechanical performance by comparing strength properties and observe that a mass-normalized flexural strength measure is meaningful when selecting an adequate infill pattern. Honeycomb showed the highest absolute flexural strength; strength per mass peaked at 90% infill. Mass reduction effected by infill density reduction fails to be linear; lowering infill down to 50% decreases mass marginally by up to 17% only. The performance of each infill pattern and comparisons between mass, strength, and print time are described to serve as a guide for designers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.