ArticlePolymers2026
Rheological Evolution and Viscoelastic Transition of Ambient-Curing Epoxy-Urethane Reactive Polymer Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambient-curing epoxy-urethane reactive polymer composites require a balance between initial flowability and subsequent structure buildup. In this study, epoxy-urethane reactive polymer composites containing precipitated calcium carbonate were prepared and referred to as EUPC formulations. Their rheological evolution was characterized by flow sweep, temperature sweep, time sweep, three-interval thixotropy tests (3ITT), amplitude sweep, and oscillatory time sweep. The formulations exhibited distinct initial flow resistance and strong temperature sensitivity, with apparent viscosity decreasing as temperature increased. During ambient curing, viscosity increased continuously, indicating progressive rheological buildup under the selected testing conditions. The 3ITT results showed high-shear-induced apparent viscosity reduction followed by recovery-stage viscosity evolution after returning to the low-shear condition, indicating that the recovery index should be interpreted as an apparent post-shear recovery index rather than a purely thixotropic recovery parameter. Oscillatory measurements revealed a gradual transition from viscous-dominated to more elastic-dominated behavior, and the apparent gel time followed the sequence EUPC-2 < EUPC-4 < EUPC-1 < EUPC-3 < EUPC-5 < EUPC-6. These results indicate that EUPC processability and structure buildup should be evaluated by integrating initial viscosity, temperature sensitivity, post-shear response, and operational viscous-to-elastic transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.