ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Meso-Scale Computational Framework for Predicting Fracture Mechanisms in 3D-Printed Bouligand Cementitious Metamaterials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inherent brittleness of cementitious materials presents a fundamental limitation for advanced structural applications. While bio-inspired Bouligand architectures have demonstrated remarkable damage tolerance in natural composites, their systematic translation to brittle inorganic binders via 3D concrete printing (3DCP)-and the development of high-fidelity meso-scale models to quantitatively map the resulting strength-toughness design space-remains underexplored. This study aims to decouple the intrinsic topological toughening potential of helicoidal Bouligand architectures from the stochastic defects inherent to additive manufacturing, through a meso-scale finite element (FE) framework. To physically validate the model, a nano-clay-assisted rheological strategy was utilized to enable the support-free fabrication of these helicoidal prototypes. Computationally, a meso-scale FE framework integrating the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model with three-dimensional cohesive zone elements was developed to explicitly resolve inter- and intra-layer interfacial crack kinematics. Coupled physical compression tests and numerical simulations indicate that the 15° Bouligand architecture achieves a computationally predicted 16.3-fold increase in volumetric energy absorption (experimentally: 13.7-fold) compared to the 0° unidirectional baseline, with a modest ~11% reduction in compressive strength (from ~33.0 MPa to ~29.5 MPa in simulations; ~12% experimentally). Furthermore, numerical parametric studies across the complete pitch-angle design space reveal an optimal topological window at 15-30°, wherein the competing effects of crack deflection and structural integrity are balanced. Imperfection sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the topological toughening mechanism is relatively robust: even with a 30% reduction in inter-filament bonding strength, the work of fracture remains 12.4 times higher than that of the 0° control. These findings suggest that spatial toolpath programming offers a viable, geometry-driven strategy for developing damage-tolerant cementitious composites, complementing conventional material-level reinforcement approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.