Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451951›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Orthogonal Experimental Study on Mix Proportion Optimization and Mechanical Properties Comparison of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Made with Recycled Glass Pumice and Ceramsite.

Xiao Li, Ruirui Qian, Zhihao Zhai, Chengquan Wang, Mingyu Fang, Xinquan Wang, Yuxuan Ding, Tengfang Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao LiSchool of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Ruirui QianSchool of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China.
Zhihao ZhaiCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Chengquan WangSchool of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0738-7829
Mingyu FangCCTEG Chongqing Engineering (Group) Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400042, China.
Xinquan WangSchool of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1518-8793
Yuxuan DingCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Tengfang DongCollege of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation LTGG23E080001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of using recycled glass pumice (microcellular glass pumice aggregate, MGPA) as a substitute for traditional lightweight aggregates and to compare its mechanical performance with that of expanded clay ceramsite, this study systematically investigated the effects of water-cement ratio (0.40-0.46), cement content (330-360 kg/m

Indexed as

ceramsitecompressive strengthlightweight aggregate concretemix designorthogonal experimental designrecycled glass pumice

Identifiers

PMID42451951
PMCPMC13363254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.