ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Preparation of Ternary Solid Waste-Based Composite Cementitious Material and Its Performance in Stabilized Gravel.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To support the achievement of the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals and promote the resource utilization of industrial solid waste, a ternary solid waste composite cementitious material was prepared by blending ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash (FA), and carbide slag (CS) with cement. The optimal mix ratio was determined through single-factor experiments and response surface methodology. The synergistic hydration mechanism was elucidated using microstructural characterization techniques, including XRD, FTIR, TG-DTG, and SEM. The composite material was then applied to a semirigid base course, and its mechanical properties and durability were systematically evaluated. The results indicate that the optimal levels of FA, GGBFS, and CS investigated in the single-factor experiments are 20-40%, 30-50%, and 2-6%, respectively. The optimal mix ratio of the ternary solid waste composite is 21.0% FA, 36.3% GGBFS, and 5.7% CS. The underlying microstructural mechanism is that carbide slag creates a highly alkaline environment, which activates the pozzolanic activity of GGBFS and fly ash, leading to the formation of hydration products dominated by C-(A)-S-H gel. With increasing curing age, the gel structure evolves from a loose and disordered state to a dense and ordered state, ultimately forming a compact microstructure based on a highly polymerized C-(A)-S-H gel matrix. The 7-day unconfined compressive strength of the stabilized gravel using the solid waste-based composite cementitious material reached 5.93 MPa, and the 28-day drying shrinkage coefficient was reduced by 18.3% compared with that of cement-stabilized gravel. After 18 freeze-thaw cycles, the compressive strength increased by 2.4%, with the pore structure characterized by a "macropores decreasing, micropores increasing" refinement pattern. After 18 wetting-drying cycles, the cumulative strength loss was 11.26%, outperforming cement-stabilized gravel. Combined with SEM observations, these performance improvements are attributed to the densely intertwined hydration products, particularly C-S-H gel, which effectively fill the voids between aggregate particles and significantly enhance the volume stability, freeze-thaw resistance, and wetting-drying durability of the stabilized gravel. The application of this cementitious material in a semirigid base course demonstrates excellent mechanical and durability properties, providing a theoretical basis and technical support for the widespread application of industrial solid waste in road engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.