ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Improvement of Contact Models by Finite Element Analysis for the Evaluation of Yeast Mechanical Properties.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we extended our previous studies on the limitations of classical contact models from polymers to a biological system. We used yeast as a model system to investigate how contact evolution during indentation affects the accuracy of AFM-based determination of Young's modulus. We proposed a practical correction framework for the classical Hertz and Sneddon flat-punch models to improve the extraction of mechanical properties from experimental data. Force-indentation curves were measured using a spherical (SPHERE) probe with a 2 μm radius and a flat (FLAT) probe with a 4 μm radius of plateau. The experimental results were analyzed using both corrected and uncorrected contact models, while a finite element analysis (FEA) model was used to determine the contact radius-indentation dependence. It showed that Young's modulus estimated from AFM indentation using classical formulations is probe-dependent because the contact radius is inadequately described. By incorporating the FEA-derived effective contact radius into Hertz and Sneddon contact models, the same Young's modulus was obtained for yeast with both probes and compared to reference values with other techniques. These findings establish contact evolution as a governing factor in AFM-based cell mechanics and provide a practical route toward robust, probe-independent, and more accurate determination of mechanical properties for living cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.