ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Current Developments in the Use of FDM 3D-Printed Materials for Efficient Heat Transfer Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work investigates the potential of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for prototyping and developing functional components in thermal systems, with particular emphasis on thermal and mechanical performance. The study focuses on two complementary prototyping strategies: (i) the use of metal-filled polymer filaments in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), also known as Material Extrusion (MEX) according to ISO/ASTM 52900:2022, and (ii) a hybrid approach combining polymer 3D printing with conductive coating and electrochemical copper deposition. While metal-filled filaments provide a rapid and low-cost solution for early-stage prototyping, their mechanical properties remain similar to those of the polymer matrix, limiting their applicability in load-bearing structures. In contrast, the hybrid method enables the fabrication of hollow metallic geometries with improved thermal and electrical conductivity. This approach is more time-consuming and process-intensive and is therefore considered a subsequent stage in the prototyping workflow following initial MEX-based design iterations. Compared with conventional polymer-based MEX, several AM approaches enable the development and fabrication of fully metallic or metal-functional structures, including Powder Bed Fusion (PBF), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and hybrid polymer-metal methods based on electroplating. Furthermore, understanding mechanical properties such as tensile strength is essential for assessing the applicability of AM materials in energy system components. The results contribute to bridging the gap between rapid prototyping and the implementation of advanced AM technologies in thermal-related applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.