ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Materials Used in Electric Vehicle Battery Housings: Recycling Pathways and Circular Design-A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Battery housings are critical structural and safety components in electric vehicles, fulfilling multiple functions related to mechanical protection, crashworthiness, thermal management, fire resistance, electromagnetic shielding, and integration of battery modules into the vehicle body. While metallic housings, particularly aluminum and steel, remain dominant in industrial applications, increasing attention is being given to composite materials as lightweight alternatives capable of improving energy efficiency and extending driving range. However, the growing use of composites in battery enclosures raises important questions regarding recyclability, end-of-life management, and compatibility with circular economy principles. This review critically examines the current state of the art in composite materials used for electric vehicle battery housings, with particular emphasis on glass- and carbon-fiber-reinforced thermoplastics, thermoset composites, sandwich structures, and hybrid multi-material systems. The paper discusses the functional requirements imposed on battery housings and analyzes how these requirements influence material selection and design strategies. Particular attention is devoted to recycling pathways applicable to composite battery enclosures, including mechanical recycling, thermal treatment, chemical recycling, and reuse-oriented approaches, as well as to the limitations associated with mixed-material assemblies, adhesives, coatings, and integrated functions. The review also addresses circular design strategies for battery housings, including design for disassembly, material traceability, modularity, and the incorporation of recycled polymers and secondary reinforcements into new housing systems. Current research gaps are identified in the integration of structural performance, fire safety, manufacturability, and recyclability within a single design framework. The analysis shows that thermoplastic composites currently offer the most promising route toward circular battery enclosures, while thermoset-based systems still face significant challenges in high-value recycling. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions required for the development of lightweight, safe and recyclable composite battery housings aligned with sustainable mobility and circular economy goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.