Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451881›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Paper and Cardboard Packaging: From Cellulosic Substrates to Functional and Hybrid Architectures.

Leonardo Pagnotta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leonardo PagnottaDepartment of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Arcavacata, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-5185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paper and cardboard are widely used in packaging due to their renewable origin, low density, printability, and established recycling infrastructures. However, monolithic cellulosic substrates are intrinsically limited by porosity and moisture sensitivity, resulting in inadequate barrier performance for demanding applications. Consequently, paper-based packaging has evolved toward functionalised systems based on coatings, multilayers, and hybrid architectures. This review adopts a system-level approach based on a structured and criteria-driven analysis of the scientific and technical literature to examine the transition from base cellulosic substrates to advanced paper-based packaging structures. The study integrates material composition, layer architecture, and interfacial phenomena, and develops a classification and interpretation framework that systematically links structural design variables to key performance domains, including barrier behaviour, mechanical integrity, converting compatibility, food-contact safety, and end-of-life management. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of functional layers as critical design variables governing both performance enhancement and circularity constraints. By systematically correlating structure, mechanisms, and functional outcomes, the analysis highlights the central trade-offs between barrier efficiency and recyclability and identifies design-for-recycling and controlled delamination as key strategies for the development of next-generation sustainable paper-based packaging.

Indexed as

barrier propertiescompostabilityconverting compatibilityfood-contact materialsfunctional coatingshybrid packaging systemsmultilayer architecturespaper-based packagingrecyclabilitysustainable packaging

Identifiers

PMID42451881
PMCPMC13362800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.