ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Exploring the Potential for Yttrium Recovery from Secondary Sources: (Bio)hydrometallurgical and Solvometallurgical Routes.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Yttrium is one of the lesser-known critical elements, but it has recently gained significant market attention due to a dramatic price increase of up to 1400% in Europe. Although its primary application is in phosphors (e.g., in LEDs), modern society heavily depends on these technologies, making yttrium indispensable. However, the limited availability of yttrium raises concerns about its long-term supply. Therefore, there is a need for efficient techniques to recover yttrium from secondary materials to ensure a stable supply. While the wastes contain only trace amounts of yttrium and often have complex elemental compositions, they are more readily available than primary sources. The yttrium content ranges from a few percent in spent phosphors to several hundred ppm in red mud, around a few dozen ppm in phosphogypsum, and up to several ppm in coal and coal fly ashes. Although conventional hydrometallurgical methods are commonly used, they lack selectivity for yttrium recovery. In contrast, unconventional solvometallurgical and bioleaching approaches currently play a relatively minor role in recovery applications. This review discusses a range of methods investigated for yttrium recovery from different types of secondary resources, including pretreatment (where applicable), leaching, and subsequent yttrium recovery from the resulting leachates. Although the chemical and phase compositions of yttrium-bearing waste materials differ substantially, necessitating tailored treatment strategies, acid leaching remains the predominant extraction route and is most commonly followed by solvent extraction and/or oxalate precipitation. Most studies reported to date have been conducted at the laboratory scale. Despite progress and the development of promising recovery concepts, the efficient separation of high-purity yttrium from other rare earth elements and co-existing impurities continues to represent the key obstacle to commercial-scale application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.