ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Modelling the Mechanical Properties of Architected Cellular Solids for Structural Applications: A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among a broad range of promising applications, the use of cellular solids as lightweight structural components is an important field of research that requires reliable predictions of their stiffness and strength. Predictive and general models should not depend on extensive parameter-fitting experiments and should not rely on computationally intensive numerical calculations for each new set of geometric parameters and loading conditions. An overview of models for 2D, 2.5D, and three-dimensional structures will be presented. Most 2D and 2.5D models neglect out-of-plane behaviour and the face sheets used in sandwich panels. 3D studies, mainly by finite element models (FEMs), are often limited to a narrow set of geometries and simple loading conditions. Elastic anisotropy is well covered, but calculating yield surfaces remains a challenge. Simplified models based on structural mechanics are rare and often limited in scope. They offer a flexible, computationally efficient approach for simulating truss-based materials. For more advanced designs, parameter-based FEMs must be developed for any loading condition to facilitate the generalised incorporation of 3D cellular solids in mechanical design. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are promising approaches for making optimal use of experimental and FEM results across multidimensional parameter spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.