Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451726›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bridging Algorithms and Biocatalysis: Perspectives on AI-Supported Enzyme Engineering.

Rosa Teijeiro-Juiz, Thomas Brück, Bernhard Loll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rosa Teijeiro-JuizLaboratory of Structural Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-3403-6755
Thomas BrückWerner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2113-6957
Bernhard LollLaboratory of Structural Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-4488

Funding

European Union 101072686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of computational and experimental methods has become indispensable for optimization and rational enzyme design. Recently, the development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools has further streamlined enzyme engineering pipelines, enabling more accurate designs, while reducing the number of variants required for experimental validation. However, due to the intricate complexity of enzymatic systems, significant challenges must be addressed before we take the next step to fully optimize the use of these AI-guided enzyme design methodologies. These challenges include un-curated datasets, the need to consider both the static and dynamic structure of enzymes, and the requirement for effective interdisciplinary collaborations to ensure the integration of computational and experimental approaches. Here, we present recent advances in AI-based computational enzyme design, discussing the main challenges in the field and how a combination with classical physics-based methods could help overcome them. We further explore novel trends that could completely modulate the future of protein design and provide our outlook on the key concepts and future opportunities that will shape the next steps of enzyme design.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceEnzymesProtein EngineeringBiocatalysisEnzymesartificial intelligencede novo designenzyme designnon-canonical amino acidsprotein engineeringprotein stability

Identifiers

PMID42451726
PMCPMC13363595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.