Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Petko DenevLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-791X
Desislava TenevaLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-2238
Manol OgnyanovLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-0854
Mariya PimpilovaLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6105-2715
Ani PetrovaLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Georgi DimitrovLaboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Bela VasilevaInstitute of Molecular Biology "Acad. R. Tsanev", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-8718-6412
Kamelia Hristova-PanushevaInstitute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8348-8336
Natalia KrastevaInstitute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7423-7412
George MiloshevInstitute of Molecular Biology "Acad. R. Tsanev", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-8899
Milena GeorgievaInstitute of Molecular Biology "Acad. R. Tsanev", Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2371-7544
Funding
European Union BG-RRP-2.017-0043/16.12.2024European Union through the NextGenerationEU instrument BG-RRP-2.017-0043/16.12.2024
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study investigates subcritical water extraction (SWE) as an alternative to hydroalcoholic extraction for the production of
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Subcritical Water Extraction Enables the Production of Cichoric and Caftaric Acid-Standardized · full record | OpenQuestion