ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing Bone Repair Process: Application and Perspective on Photothermal Materials.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repairing large bone defects remains a clinical challenge in orthopedics. Near-infrared (NIR) photothermal therapy (PTT) has recently expanded from high-temperature tumor ablation to the field of mild bone regeneration. Maintaining temperatures within a mild window of 40-42 °C accelerates bone healing by activating osteogenic signals, modulating the immune microenvironment, and providing antibacterial effects. It is important to note that the therapeutic efficacy is highly dependent on the precise control of both temperature and exposure duration: temperatures exceeding 42-43 °C can induce cell apoptosis, while temperatures above 45 °C typically cause necrosis. The reviewed studies employed controlled exposure times (typically 5-15 min per session) to maintain cell viability above 85%, with functional assessments confirming preserved osteogenic differentiation capacity of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and maintained macrophage plasticity after mild photothermal treatment. This performance depends on photothermal conversion materials. This paper reviews the applications of MXene, black phosphorus (BP), polydopamine/graphene oxide (PDA/GO), and metal-based nanomaterials in bone repair. We also analyze photothermal-based immune regulation, sequential repair strategies, and tumor theranostics. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future trends to guide the design of next-generation smart bone repair materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.