Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451553›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Eddy-Current-Induced Waveform Reconstruction by Metallic Probe Carriers in Magnetic Flux Leakage Inspection.

Xiaoyuan Jiang, Bohan Jia, Yanhua Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoyuan JiangSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-2453
Bohan JiaSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Yanhua SunSchool of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-9366

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF0501001National Natural Science Foundation of China 52275532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metallic probe carriers are commonly used in magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection to support sensing elements and maintain lift-off, but a conductive carrier located near the sensor can act as an active electromagnetic boundary. This study investigates the carrier-induced waveform reconstruction caused by such a conductive near-field boundary. A theoretical model is developed to describe the induced current, secondary magnetic field, and relaxation-related downstream memory generated when the carrier moves through a non-uniform leakage field. Transient finite-element simulations are used to examine the effects of carrier material, scanning speed, and concave carrier geometry. Compared with the air reference, aluminum and copper carriers produce stage-dependent waveform reconstruction, including valley modification, peak modulation, feature-position shift, and trailing-side extension. The quantitative waveform-deviation indicators increase with increasing speed and are further regulated by carrier geometry. Experimental results based on repeated magnetic response events confirm amplitude suppression, non-zero residual after amplitude matching, response broadening, and enhanced trailing asymmetry. These results demonstrate that the metallic probe carrier is not an electromagnetically transparent holder but an active near-field conductive boundary that should be considered in probe-carrier design and MFL signal interpretation.

Indexed as

magnetic flux leakage (MFL)metallic probe carriermotion-induced eddy currentsecondary magnetic fieldwaveform reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42451553
PMCPMC13363968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.