ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Transoral Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: Communication-Related Outcomes and Feasibility.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of cleft lip alveolus and/or palate includes surgical repair to treat communication-related outcomes such as velopharyngeal insufficiency and otological dysfunction. Robot-assisted surgery has recently evolved into a promising adjunct to conventional surgery, particularly for complex procedures such as transoral (reconstructive) surgery. This structured literature review aims to investigate whether robot-assisted transoral cleft palate repair enhances communication (i.e., speech and otological) outcomes compared to conventional manual cleft palate surgery. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Primary outcomes were the change in cleft speech characteristics and otological disease after robot-assisted cleft palate surgery versus manual cleft palate surgery. The available evidence on communication-related outcomes remains sparse. Six relevant articles were included. In only one study, transoral robotic cleft surgery (TORCS) significantly reduced otitis media with effusion (OME), need for ventilation tubes and hearing threshold within 2 years post-surgery. No postoperative speech or velopharyngeal outcomes were reported. In conclusion, transoral robotic cleft surgery (TORCS) appears safe and feasible for repair of a cleft palate. It provides superior intraoral view and improved surgeon ergonomics. Current drawbacks are the costs and the available tools, the extended surgical duration and the lack of haptic feedback, which limit the current clinical applicability of TORCS. Based on limited clinical evidence, TORCS may support faster recovery of Eustachian tube function and hearing, but no conclusions on speech outcomes can yet be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.