ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Two-Stage GMFAMM Approximation for Joint Bias Correction of NASA POWER Hydroclimatic Data: The
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose and empirically evaluate a two-stage approximation to a Generalized Multivariate Functional Additive Mixed Model (GMFAMM) for the joint bias correction of five NASA POWER reanalysis variables: minimum and maximum temperature (Tmin, Tmax), relative humidity (RH), solar radiation (Rad), and precipitation occurrence (Pbin). Our primary contribution is the first operational-scale evaluation of such a framework (≈200,000 station-day observations, two orders of magnitude beyond previous studies) together with its deployment in an open-access web application. A systematic grid of more than 200 marginal configurations is evaluated on a strict chronological 70/30 hold-out (training 2016-2022; testing 2023-2025) to identify the optimal marginal specification per variable. Against a correctly specified marginal baseline, station-level linear calibration combined with the marginal GAMM removes the bulk of the systematic bias (RMSE reductions of ≈80%, 82% and 30% for Tmin, Tmax and RH). A shared latent step, using the first principal component of the marginal residual matrix as a scalar proxy for Λ0(t), yields additional but
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.