Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451542›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Two-Stage GMFAMM Approximation for Joint Bias Correction of NASA POWER Hydroclimatic Data: The

David Arango-Londoño, Delia Ortega-Lenis, Mauricio A Mazo-Lopera, Paula Moraga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Arango-LondoñoDepartamento de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0727-1714
Delia Ortega-LenisDepartamento de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2217-3530
Mauricio A Mazo-LoperaDepartamento de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Paula MoragaComputer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Colombian Ministry of Sciences 909, 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose and empirically evaluate a two-stage approximation to a Generalized Multivariate Functional Additive Mixed Model (GMFAMM) for the joint bias correction of five NASA POWER reanalysis variables: minimum and maximum temperature (Tmin, Tmax), relative humidity (RH), solar radiation (Rad), and precipitation occurrence (Pbin). Our primary contribution is the first operational-scale evaluation of such a framework (≈200,000 station-day observations, two orders of magnitude beyond previous studies) together with its deployment in an open-access web application. A systematic grid of more than 200 marginal configurations is evaluated on a strict chronological 70/30 hold-out (training 2016-2022; testing 2023-2025) to identify the optimal marginal specification per variable. Against a correctly specified marginal baseline, station-level linear calibration combined with the marginal GAMM removes the bulk of the systematic bias (RMSE reductions of ≈80%, 82% and 30% for Tmin, Tmax and RH). A shared latent step, using the first principal component of the marginal residual matrix as a scalar proxy for Λ0(t), yields additional but

Indexed as

bias correctionClausius–Clapeyronfunctional additive mixed modelhydroclimatic modellingmultivariate functional data analysisNASA POWERR Shinysatellite dataspatial statisticsValle del Cauca

Identifiers

PMID42451542
PMCPMC13363877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.