Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451535›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Mobgap: A State-of-the-Art Python Framework for Reproducible Estimation and Algorithm Validation of Digital Mobility Outcomes from a Single Wearable Device.

Cameron Kirk, Arne Kuederle, Paolo Tasca, Metin Bicer, Dimitrios Megaritis, Eran Gazit, Tecla Bonci, Anisora Ionescu, Chloe Hinchliffe, Alexandru Stihi and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Cameron KirkTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-5816
Arne KuederleDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Paolo TascaDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-7157-3451
Metin BicerTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-2080
Dimitrios MegaritisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6786-4346
Eran GazitCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.
Tecla BonciSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8255-4730
Anisora IonescuLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2341-4383
Chloe HinchliffeTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.
Alexandru StihiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Insigneo Institute for in Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6073-671X
Anika MueckeDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Zamal BabarDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Ioannis VogiatzisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-7207
Bjoern EskofierDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0417-0336
Claudia MazzàSchool of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-1746
Andrea CereattiDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-5382
Arne MuellerTranslational Medicine, Biomedical Research, Novartis, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6551-2283
Daniel RooksTranslational Medicine, Biomedical Research, Novartis, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-3517
Brian CaulfieldSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Population Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-9587
Lynn RochesterTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.
Silvia Del DinTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-4751

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 820820Innovative Medicines Initiative 853981UK Research and Innovation EP/X031012/1UK Research and Innovation EP/X036146/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective, continuous assessment of real-world mobility using wearables has significant potential to transform clinical research and practice, yet the field lacks standardised, open-source tools that enable reproducible algorithm real-world validation, across multiple clinical cohorts. This would improve transparency around definitions and performance, thereby enhancing interpretation and more meaningful comparison across studies. The Mobilise-D consortium validated a comprehensive analytical pipeline for estimating digital mobility outcomes from wearables, originally implemented in a combination of MATLAB, R, and Python codes. To overcome the licencing, reproducibility, and accessibility limitations of this implementation, the pipeline has been re-implemented and re-validated, against gold standards, as the open-source mobgap Python package. Here, we describe the mobgap ecosystem, detail how algorithms can be integrated and benchmarked in a reproducible way and present a re-validation of the pipeline against reference data across six clinical cohorts under real-world conditions. Validation results showed that across all cohorts, walking speed was estimated with an absolute error of 0.10 m/s and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.81, demonstrating comparable or superior performance to the original implementation. Mobgap (v1.2) is openly available and is intended to serve as a reproducible reference implementation and benchmarking platform for researchers developing or validating mobility analysis algorithms using wearable data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsWearable Electronic DevicesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWalking Speeddigital healthgait analysisopen source softwarePythonreal worldwearables

Identifiers

PMID42451535
PMCPMC13364285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.