ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Physics-Informed Dual-Branch LSTM Network for UAV Position and Attitude Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To mitigate error accumulation and long-term drift in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) position and attitude estimation using purely inertial measurement unit (IMU) data, this paper presents a dual-branch physics-informed long short-term memory (DPI-LSTM) network incorporating shared temporal encoding, a dual-branch structured regression framework, and physical consistency constraints. The model employs a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based temporal encoder to extract temporal features from IMU time-window sequences. Established inertial kinematic relationships are embedded into the dual-branch LSTM framework as loss constraints, providing physics-based regularisation to guide the network during training. By modelling translational and rotational states separately through the position and attitude branches, the model improves stability and physical interpretability while retaining the advantages of task decoupling. Systematic experiments were conducted on the University of Zurich First-Person View (UZH-FPV) Drone Racing dataset, and comparisons were made with traditional inertial navigation methods and representative deep learning-based inertial odometry approaches. The experimental results indicate that the proposed model demonstrates a measurable reduction in positional root mean square error (RMSE) on the evaluated test sequences, decreasing the RMSE to 0.0654 m, which represents a reduction of more than 20% when compared with inertial odometry network (IONet), convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), and robust neural inertial navigation (RoNIN). Further ablation studies and cross-sequence evaluation indicate that the physical consistency constraints and the dual-branch architecture contribute to improved position estimation stability under the evaluated benchmark sequences. The proposed kinematically constrained framework provides a viable IMU-only position and attitude estimation module, laying the groundwork for future UAV digital twin and precision-agriculture applications where continuous and physically consistent position and attitude information is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.