ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Real-World Benchmark of Monte Carlo-Assisted EKF Odometry for Online Pose Estimation in 2D LiDAR SLAM.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates an Adaptive Monte Carlo Localization-Extended Kalman Filter (AMCL-EKF) pose-estimation stack for repeatable 2D LiDAR SLAM in GPS-denied indoor inspection scenarios. AMCL was used as an online map-referenced correction source fused with LiDAR odometry and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data, and the resulting pose estimate was supplied online to three SLAM backends: Cartographer, GMapping, and SLAM Toolbox. Experiments were performed with a wheeled Husarion Panther and a quadruped Boston Dynamics Spot in three indoor environments of different geometric complexity, producing 720 SLAM executions. Trajectory repeatability was assessed using SE(2)-aligned pairwise and centroid-based ATE-style dispersion and translational RPE, while map repeatability was evaluated with occupied-cell IoU. Accordingly, the metrics were used to quantify between-run dispersion rather than absolute accuracy against external ground-truth data. The results show that AMCL-EKF fusion is highly dependent on the environment, platform, and SLAM backend. AMCL improved selected configurations, especially for Spot in structured environments and for Panther map consistency, but degraded others in geometrically repetitive corridors and mixed-structure spaces. The study also shows that the presence of AMCL-assisted odometry correction alone does not determine final trajectory repeatability, because each SLAM backend incorporates the supplied fused pose estimate differently. The findings support confidence-aware AMCL integration and motivate integrated SLAM architectures resistant to over-correction. These results provide guidance for robust autonomous mapping and inspection with heterogeneous mobile robotic platforms in real environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.