Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451497›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Benchmarking Modern Deep Learning Models for Electroluminescence-Based Solar Cell Defect Detection.

Gökhan Şahin, Ali Cengiz Rüstemli, Ahmed Yaseen Bishree Al-Ani, Sabir Rüstemli, Erdal Akin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gökhan ŞahinCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-2453
Ali Cengiz RüstemliSoftware Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Ostim Teknik University, 06000 Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0008-2247-5898
Ahmed Yaseen Bishree Al-AniElectrical-Electronics Engineering Department, Engineering and Architecture Faculty, Bitlis Eren University, 13000 Bitlis, Turkey.
Sabir RüstemliElectrical-Electronics Engineering Department, Engineering and Architecture Faculty, Bitlis Eren University, 13000 Bitlis, Turkey.
Erdal AkinDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a deep learning-based framework for the automated classification of photovoltaic solar cells as defective or normal using electroluminescence (EL) imaging. A balanced dataset containing 20,400 EL images, comprising 10,200 defective and 10,200 normal solar cells, was used for model development and evaluation. To reflect practical inspection requirements, cracked and broken cells were combined into a single defective category, resulting in a binary classification task. The dataset includes both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells, which were analyzed together within a unified classification framework to improve applicability to real-world photovoltaic systems. To ensure a fair and unbiased evaluation, dataset partitioning was performed prior to any preprocessing or augmentation operations, and each image was assigned exclusively to the training, validation, or test subset. Data augmentation was applied only to the training set, eliminating the possibility of data leakage. Four state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, EfficientNet-B2, ConvNeXt-Tiny, MaxViT-T, and ResNet-50, were trained and evaluated under identical experimental conditions using the same preprocessing pipeline, training strategy, and dataset split. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, confusion matrices, and explainability-based activation and attention heat maps. All evaluated models achieved classification accuracies exceeding 98%, demonstrating strong capability for EL-based defect detection. EfficientNet-B2 achieved the highest numerical performance, reaching 99.31% accuracy, 0.9931 F1-score, and 0.9987 ROC-AUC. MaxViT-T exhibited similarly strong performance with rapid convergence and balanced class-wise metrics, while ConvNeXt-Tiny and ResNet-50 also produced highly reliable results. Heat map visualizations revealed that EfficientNet-B2 and MaxViT-T concentrated their attention more precisely on defect regions such as cracks and fractures, providing visual interpretability in addition to quantitative performance. The results demonstrate that modern deep learning architectures can accurately and reliably detect photovoltaic cell defects from EL images under a unified binary classification framework. Furthermore, explainability techniques enhance the transparency of model predictions, supporting the practical deployment of intelligent inspection systems for photovoltaic manufacturing and maintenance applications.

Indexed as

binary classificationConvNeXt-Tinydeep learningdefect detectionEfficientNet-B2electroluminescence imagingexplainable artificial intelligenceheat mapsMaxViT-Tphotovoltaic cellsResNet-50ROC-AUC

Identifiers

PMID42451497
PMCPMC13364301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.