Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451434›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Adapting a Foundation Monocular Depth Model for Soccer Video: From Synthetic Supervision to Match-Level Reliability.

Ju-Seong Do, Ho-Young Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ju-Seong DoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-7443-254X
Ho-Young JungDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0398-831X

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT IITP-2026-RS-2020-II201808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soccer-video analysis centers on pitch-plane tracking, but camera-view depth cues such as occlusion and goal-area structure are not fully represented on the field plane. Synthetic benchmarks provide dense supervision unavailable for real broadcasts, but whether adaptation yields predictions that are reproducible across matches and operationally feasible remains unclear. We evaluate a Depth Anything V2 model adapted to SoccerNet-Depth with four components: Unaligned MDE accuracy, scale-and-shift aligned diagnostic, match-to-match reliability, and accuracy-cost trade-off. The model achieves an unaligned validation AbsRel of 0.00372. The aligned diagnostic shows that Base DAv2 retained substantial scene-depth structure, whereas SoccerNet adaptation enabled direct compatibility with the normalized target without per-frame ground-truth fitting. Relative to the VKITTI-fine-tuned reference, the adaptation improved all eight metrics in all 21 validation matches, with paired Wilcoxon tests significant after Bonferroni correction. On the challenge split, it reduced AbsRel by 34.1% versus the official baseline. The higher-resolution configuration improved the validation AbsRel by 5.9%, while the default retained a better accuracy-cost balance. At 401.57 ms per frame, the default is suited to post-match analysis, not live or near-real-time use. The study contributes a benchmark-scoped adaptation case study and protocol for foundation MDE on SoccerNet-Depth.

Indexed as

computational efficiencyDepth Anything V2foundation model adaptationmatch-level reliabilitymonocular depth estimationsoccer-video analysissports computer vision

Identifiers

PMID42451434
PMCPMC13364479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.