ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Validation of a Sensorized Forearm Crutch for Quantifying Partial Weight-Bearing During Assisted Gait Using Optical Motion Capture and Instrumented Treadmill.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human gait analysis is a key component of rehabilitation medicine, enabling objective assessment of patient recovery. In crutch-assisted locomotion, however, conventional forearm crutches operate as passive devices, providing no quantitative information on load distribution or patient adherence to partial weight-bearing (PWB) prescriptions. This work presents the design and dynamic validation of a sensorized forearm crutch system for biomechanical monitoring during assisted gait. The proposed device combines a force-sensing module based on a full Wheatstone bridge strain-gauge configuration with a 6-axis inertial measurement unit (IMU) to capture both axial load and crutch orientation. Sensor fusion was implemented through a complementary filter to estimate pitch and roll angles under dynamic conditions. The system was calibrated through static loading procedures and validated against reference instrumentation, including an optoelectronic motion capture system and an instrumented dual-belt treadmill with force platforms. Unlike previous studies relying on stationary force platforms that capture discrete steps and may alter natural gait, this validation approach enabled continuous, stride-by-stride force and orientation measurements without restricting foot placement. Experimental trials were conducted with unimpaired participants performing assisted gait using 2-point and 3-point patterns at two partial weight-bearing levels (20% and 40% body weight) and two walking speeds (0.80 m/s and 1.20 m/s). Dynamic validation showed good agreement with the treadmill reference, with force RMSE values of 9.33±1.70 N for the left crutch and 12.90±2.85 N for the right crutch, and with coefficients of determination of R2=0.9956 and R2=0.9927, respectively. Orientation RMSE values were 1.08±0.44° (roll, right), 2.06±0.56° (roll, left), 1.79±0.55° (pitch, right), and 1.66±0.37° (pitch, left). Beyond validation accuracy, the system enabled extraction of a set of quantitative biomechanical descriptors directly from crutch signals, axial load, cadence, crutch contact variability, load asymmetry, pitch asymmetry, and crutch stance/swing asymmetries, characterizing walking stability, bilateral coordination, and gait regularity during continuous assisted locomotion. These results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating force and inertial sensors into forearm crutches to enable quantitative monitoring of assisted gait, with potential applications in rehabilitation assessment and real-time feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.