ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multi-Sensor, Multi-Movement Exploratory Study of Motion Tape Strain Data for Low Back Pain Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective assessment of low back pain (LBP) is challenging due to subtle, task-dependent movement impairments that are poorly captured by existing sensing technologies. Motion Tape (MT), which is a self-adhesive elastic fabric skin strain sensor, enables skin-conforming measurement of localized biomechanical strain during functional movement, but its discriminative utility for LBP remains unclear. We examine this question in a multi-sensor, multi-movement setting and analyze whether MT signals encode discriminative structure that distinguishes individuals with LBP from healthy controls. Using data from 20 participants performing 19 functional movements with six sensors, we evaluate movement-specific classification under a leave-pair-out protocol and examine which movements, sensor placements, and features are most informative. Our analysis reveals that group separation is highly selective: only a small subset of movements, most notably forward flexion, consistently supports accurate classification, while many movements remain at near-chance level. We find that temporal dynamics features help in resolving difficult cases that global strain statistics fail to separate, and that informative signals are spatially localized to the lower lumbar spine. In contrast, pretrained time-series foundation models show negligible sensitivity to participant-level structure in MT signals. Overall, the findings from this exploratory study establish when and how MT sensing can effectively differentiate individuals with LBP from healthy controls, providing a principled foundation for larger-scale validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.