Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451423›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Online-Tuned Fuzzy Pre-Filtering with an Attention BiLSTM for Misbehavior Detection in Vehicular Named Data Networking.

Bassma Aldahlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bassma AldahlanDepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Jubail Industrial College, Jubail Industrial City 31961, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0006-9529-3206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicular Named Data Networking (VNDN) inherits the broadcast-oriented forwarding of NDN, which exposes safety messages to position-falsification attacks. Existing detectors rely either on static fuzzy thresholds, which drift as traffic patterns change, or on opaque deep models, which are accurate but uninterpretable to safety auditors. We propose a two-stage detector that combines an Adaptive Fuzzy Membership Tuning (AFMT) pre-filter with an attention-augmented bidirectional LSTM. AFMT is a Mamdani fuzzy classifier whose triangular membership-function parameters are updated online by gradient descent on a prediction-error feedback signal from the downstream BiLSTM, replacing offline-fixed thresholds. The BiLSTM consumes the fuzzy suspicion score as an extra feature and produces interpretable per-time-step attention weights aligned with attack onsets. On a simulator-synthesized VNDN benchmark following the five canonical VeReMi attack types, the detector attains F1-scores between 0.955 and 0.979 (macro-average 0.964), ties the strongest baselines on the hardest Random-Offset attack while achieving the highest ROC-AUC of all models (0.984), and runs in 0.44 ms per sample on a CPU. On a live OMNeT++/Veins/SUMO testbed running the five attacks on the LuST scenario, the detector attains an F1 value of 0.986. A leave-one-feature-out study shows that detection does not hinge on the Kalman plausibility feature, and on the real public VeReMi v1.0 dataset the architecture transfers to four of the five attack types at an F1 near 1.0, while the Constant Offset stays invisible to kinematics-only features, and this quantifies the value of the named-data-plane features. Every number reported here is measured from the running detector.

Indexed as

adaptive fuzzy logicattention BiLSTMintrusion detectionmisbehavior detectionVehicular Named Data NetworkingVeReMi

Identifiers

PMID42451423
PMCPMC13363726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.