ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Lightweight Zero-Trust-Based Authentication Framework for UAV Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address identity cloning, credential leakage, and delayed authorization in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems operating in open airspace, we propose a zero-trust authentication and authorization framework. SM9 identity-based mutual authentication establishes a traceable digital identity anchor. On-demand rotor acoustic verification then checks whether the current platform matches the registered identity. A Beta-distribution trust model converts authentication, verification, and behavioral evidence into dynamic authorization decisions. Experimental results show that the acoustic module blocks 104 of 110 spoofing samples. Under identity-cloning attacks, the attacker's trust value decreases from about 0.97 to 0.27 and falls below the isolation threshold of 0.4. Compared with continuous acoustic authentication, on-demand triggering reduces authentication activation frequency, average inference latency, and normalized energy consumption by 86.8%, 83.6%, and 83.0%, respectively. These results indicate that the framework links identity confirmation, entity verification, and continuous authorization under resource-constrained UAV conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.