Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451403›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Lightweight Zero-Trust-Based Authentication Framework for UAV Systems.

Xiang Qu, Wei Ou, Mengxue Pang, Yangbo Chen, Yishan Wu, Qiuling Yue, Wenbao Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiang QuSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Wei OuSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Mengxue PangSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Yangbo ChenSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Yishan WuSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Qiuling YueSchool of Cyberspace Security (School of Cryptology), Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Wenbao HanInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.

Funding

Hainan University S202510589043Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Department BE2023005-4National Natural Science Foundation of China U23A20304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address identity cloning, credential leakage, and delayed authorization in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems operating in open airspace, we propose a zero-trust authentication and authorization framework. SM9 identity-based mutual authentication establishes a traceable digital identity anchor. On-demand rotor acoustic verification then checks whether the current platform matches the registered identity. A Beta-distribution trust model converts authentication, verification, and behavioral evidence into dynamic authorization decisions. Experimental results show that the acoustic module blocks 104 of 110 spoofing samples. Under identity-cloning attacks, the attacker's trust value decreases from about 0.97 to 0.27 and falls below the isolation threshold of 0.4. Compared with continuous acoustic authentication, on-demand triggering reduces authentication activation frequency, average inference latency, and normalized energy consumption by 86.8%, 83.6%, and 83.0%, respectively. These results indicate that the framework links identity confirmation, entity verification, and continuous authorization under resource-constrained UAV conditions.

Indexed as

dynamic trust evaluationrotor acoustic fingerprintSM9UAVzero trust

Identifiers

PMID42451403
PMCPMC13363966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.