Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451399›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Identification of Acoustic Emission Spectrograms from Limestone Fracturing Based on a Novel Deep Learning Model.

Yan Zhang, Daojing Guo, Yulong Ye, Lantao Huang, Cong Fan, Jiancheng Huang, Mingdong Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan ZhangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Daojing GuoState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Yulong YeGuangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Lantao HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Cong FanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Jiancheng HuangState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Mingdong WeiState Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42477189National Natural Science Foundation of China 52068016Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2024YFHZ0341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The progressive development of microscopic fractures within rock masses is a primary mechanism of macroscopic failure, threatening the structural integrity of rock engineering systems. In this paper, a novel deep learning model, Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), is developed to accurately identify spectrogram features associated with limestone fractures. In this architecture, a PCA-based convolution encoder is seamlessly integrated as a foundational preprocessing layer before feedforwarding into the deep neural network to execute linear feature purification. The model is first validated on standard image datasets comprising handwritten digits and facial images to evaluate classification performance. Subsequently, acoustic emission signals are acquired during triaxial compression tests on limestone specimens pretreated with cyclic acid-alkali exposure. The PCA-VGG16 framework is then employed to classify the corresponding acoustic spectrograms, and its performance is quantitatively compared with a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN) and the standard VGG16 model. The results indicate that the PCA-VGG16 model achieves classification accuracies that are 19.19% and 10.77% higher than the conventional CNN and standard VGG16 models, respectively. In terms of computational efficiency, the training time is reduced by 35.00% and 23.53% compared to CNN and VGG16. The superior classification performance of the proposed PCA-VGG16 model enables accurate identification of internal microscopic fracture characteristics in limestone. Furthermore, the integration of acoustic emission signals with deep learning models offers an effective approach for quantifying internal fracture levels and predicting the progressive failure of rocks.

Indexed as

acid-alkali pretreatmentacoustic emissiondeep learningimage recognitionPCA-VGG16 model

Identifiers

PMID42451399
PMCPMC13364072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.