ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Feature-Level Fusion CBAM U-Net for Static Plantar Pressure Prediction Using Plantar Geometry and Sparse Anatomical Landmarks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate plantar pressure distribution is important for biomechanics, gait analysis, rehabilitation, and diabetic foot assessment. However, wearable plantar pressure systems are often limited by sparse sensor layouts due to hardware complexity, power consumption, and user comfort constraints. This study proposes a multimodal deep learning framework for static plantar pressure prediction using plantar geometry information and sparse landmark constraints. A convolutional block attention module U-Net architecture was developed to integrate plantar geometry and sparse landmark modalities through dual-encoder feature fusion with attention refinement. Different network architectures, fusion strategies, and landmark densities were systematically evaluated using a controlled-variable experimental design. Results demonstrated that feature-level fusion consistently outperformed data-level fusion and unimodal configurations across all landmark densities. The proposed model achieved the best performance with a normalized root mean square error of 0.087 using 16 landmarks, and the same model maintained a normalized root mean square error of 0.138 using only two landmarks, indicating promising reconstruction performance even under highly sparse sensing conditions. Marginal contribution and synergy analyses further showed that feature-level fusion more effectively captured complementary interactions between plantar geometry and sparse anatomical guidance, particularly under sparse landmark conditions. These findings suggest that multimodal feature-level fusion provides an effective strategy for sparse-to-dense plantar pressure reconstruction and may support the development of low-cost intelligent insole systems for biomechanical monitoring and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.