ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Intrusion Detection Datasets for IIoT and ICS: A Taxonomic Review with a Decision-Aid Scoring Rubric.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dataset quality significantly affects the effectiveness of a machine learning (ML) model in an intrusion detection system (IDS) for cyber-physical industrial control systems (CPS/ICS) and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Existing surveys compare datasets qualitatively or along limited dimensions, whereas this review introduces quantitative documentation and decision-aid scoring across 23 ICS/OT/IIoT datasets. These datasets are analyzed along seven measurable axes, with their attacks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for ICS tactics. Quantitatively, 14 of the 23 datasets (60.9%) are built on physical testbeds, and 22 of the 23 map to MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, spanning 11 of the 12 tactics. We introduce a checklist for documentation completeness (0-7) and a decision-aid rubric (0-15) covering realism, attack diversity, class imbalance, documentation, and reproducibility. Protocol coverage across these datasets is skewed toward Modbus (13 of 23 datasets, 57%), while many other protocols (such as Profinet and OPC UA) are underrepresented relative to their industry deployment. The available datasets show structural gaps in capturing multi-stage adversary behavior. In practice, dataset selection should pair a realism-anchored dataset with a high-reproducibility one, and account for protocol diversity and APT representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.