Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451341›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Intrusion Detection Datasets for IIoT and ICS: A Taxonomic Review with a Decision-Aid Scoring Rubric.

Ayman Termanini, Hadj Bourdoucen, Dawood Al-Abri, Ahmed Al Maashri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayman TermaniniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khodh 123, Oman.ORCID 0009-0006-8788-0638
Hadj BourdoucenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khodh 123, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-6385-3196
Dawood Al-AbriDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khodh 123, Oman.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-1900
Ahmed Al MaashriDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Al Khodh 123, Oman.ORCID 0000-0002-7018-5026

Funding

Sultan Qaboos University s132237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dataset quality significantly affects the effectiveness of a machine learning (ML) model in an intrusion detection system (IDS) for cyber-physical industrial control systems (CPS/ICS) and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). Existing surveys compare datasets qualitatively or along limited dimensions, whereas this review introduces quantitative documentation and decision-aid scoring across 23 ICS/OT/IIoT datasets. These datasets are analyzed along seven measurable axes, with their attacks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for ICS tactics. Quantitatively, 14 of the 23 datasets (60.9%) are built on physical testbeds, and 22 of the 23 map to MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, spanning 11 of the 12 tactics. We introduce a checklist for documentation completeness (0-7) and a decision-aid rubric (0-15) covering realism, attack diversity, class imbalance, documentation, and reproducibility. Protocol coverage across these datasets is skewed toward Modbus (13 of 23 datasets, 57%), while many other protocols (such as Profinet and OPC UA) are underrepresented relative to their industry deployment. The available datasets show structural gaps in capturing multi-stage adversary behavior. In practice, dataset selection should pair a realism-anchored dataset with a high-reproducibility one, and account for protocol diversity and APT representation.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityIndustryInternet of ThingsMachine LearningAIanomaly detectionCPS/IIoT securitydatasetICS securitymachine learning for securityMITRE ATT&CKOT intrusion detection

Identifiers

PMID42451341
PMCPMC13363749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.