ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Analysis of Tri-Polar Concentric Ring and Conventional Electrodes for Overt and Covert Speech.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a system that enables communication between the brain and external devices by translating brain activity into commands. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a commonly used modality for measuring brain activity. However, its low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and electrode reference problems lead to poor spatial resolution. As a result, EEG signals are often contaminated with physiological artifacts such as muscle movements. Therefore, this study used novel tripolar concentric ring electrodes (TCREs) to record brain signals related to overt and covert speech. Brain signals associated with overt and covert speech were recorded using TCRE and disc electrodes. Classification algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Fully Connected Neural Networks (FCNN), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), were used to classify the TCRE and conventional EEG signals. The data were collected from 16 healthy participants, consisting of 10 males and 6 females. The experimental results demonstrate that TCREs provide superior performance compared to conventional disc electrodes. In addition, the 0.5-1.2s interval, corresponding to the peak stimulus window, exhibits a maximum power of 250μV. The average accuracy achieved during this peak epoch was 86.25%, whereas the remaining epoch shows an accuracy of 83.5% using TCREs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.