ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Real-Time Edge Computing for Road Surface Classification Using Multi-IMU Data and a Hybrid CNN-LSTM Classification Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road quality monitoring is necessary for safety, ride comfort, and driver-assistance systems. The knowledge of road features enables preventive and corrective actions at vehicle and infrastructure levels. While deep learning models are effective for surface classification, transitioning them to real-time embedded environments requires optimization. This study deploys a model based on convolutional and long short-term memory neural networks to classify five road conditions using continuous vibration data from multiple inertial measurement units. Executed on a MicroAutoBox III Embedded PC, the system preprocesses data at vehicle speeds between 5.0 and 25.0 km/h. Compared to the offline baseline deployment, this edge-optimized architecture reduced inference latency by 88% (from 33.8 ms to 4.05 ms) while maintaining a fair weighted-average F1-score of 0.8751 in real-world, cross-platform conditions (against the offline baseline average F1-score of 0.9338). This processing time operates within the 11.6 ms limit required by the 86 Hz sensor polling rate. Additionally, geospatial mapping was able to localize structural anomalies, showing robustness to environmental lighting conditions, which frequently affect vision-based systems. This cyber-physical deployment suggests the feasibility of executing temporal deep learning real-time models. Future work will target highway-speed validation and domain adaptation to assess transferability across diverse vehicle suspensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.