Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42451318›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Research on Coverage Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on an Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm.

Hong Kheam, Vakhim Leang, Chamroeun Khim, Van Nhan Vo, Sovannarith Heng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hong KheamDepartment of Information Technology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh 120404, Cambodia.ORCID 0009-0003-5001-8444
Vakhim LeangDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh 120404, Cambodia.ORCID 0009-0003-8581-9831
Chamroeun KhimDepartment of Information Technology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh 120404, Cambodia.
Van Nhan VoFaculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Danang 550000, Vietnam.
Sovannarith HengDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh 120404, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-1079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal node deployment in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) is crucial for maximizing monitoring coverage. However, traditional metaheuristics like the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) often suffer from premature convergence and redundant clustering, creating severe coverage holes. To address this, we introduce the Density-Aware Repulsive Sparrow Search Algorithm (DAR-SSA). Integrating electrostatic principles, DAR-SSA calculates a local density-based repulsive force vector to actively disperse nodes from high-density clusters. This physics-guided approach, combined with a dynamic explorer-exploiter allocation rule, ensures a computationally efficient balance between global and local search phases. Evaluated via a probabilistic sensing model, DAR-SSA significantly outperforms standard SSA, its variants (EFSSA, EASOA), and classical algorithms (PSO, GWO). In high-density urban deployments, DAR-SSA achieves a 95.25% effective coverage rate, compared to SSA's 76.74%. In low-density environments, coverage reaches 97.12%. Validated by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, DAR-SSA proves to be a robust, efficient framework for mitigating spatial redundancy and maximizing WSN sensing coverage.

Indexed as

coverage optimizationdensity-aware repulsive sparrow search algorithmwireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID42451318
PMCPMC13364218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.